ORIGINAL PAPER
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Technology development and digitalization has brought new opportunities in many industrial sectors, including forestry. Wood measurement is an important process, that in many regions changes from manual activities to the use of digital tools, and the validation of new approaches is necessary to ensure the sustainability of the sector. This study was setup mainly as a follow-up attempt to validate the results of postural risks when using digital tools to measure the logs. In addition, the study explores the postural condition of a new measurement option, namely scanning of wood loaded into trucks. Generally, the digital measurement options including the use of smartphones and professional LiDAR scanners generated lower postural risks, results which are consistent with and validate previous findings. Although the studied measurement options showed a statistically significant different profile in terms of postural condition, manual wood measurement remains challenging in terms of postural risk. From a postural assessment perspective, transition to digital tools in wood measurement seems to be a sustainable option on the long run, but it will require the development of existing algorithms so as to be able to extract useful information form the collected data.
REFERENCES (25)
1.
Borz, S.A., Talagai, N., Cheţa, M., Chiriloiu, D., Gavilanes Montoya, A.V., Castillo Vizuete, D.D., Marcu, M.V. 2019. Physical strain, exposure to noise and postural assessment in motor-manual felling of willow short rotation coppice: Results of a preliminary study. Croat. J. For. Eng. 40, 377–388.
 
2.
Borz, S.A., Proto, A.R. 2022. Application and accuracy of smart technologies for measurements of roundwood: Evaluation of time consumption and efficiency. Comput. Electron. Agr. 197, 106990.
 
3.
Borz, S.A., Morocho Toaza, J.M., Forkuo, G.O., Marcu, M.V., 2022a. Potential of Measure app in estimating log biometrics: A comparison with conventional log measurement. Forests 13, 1028.
 
4.
Borz, S.A., Papandrea, S., Bacenetti, J., Proto, A.R. 2022b. Postural assessment of three measurement options by the OWAS method: Digital solutions seem to be better. Forests 13, 2007.
 
5.
Calvo, A. 2009. Musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) risks in forestry: A case study to propose an analysis method. Agric. Eng. Int., 11, 1–9.
 
6.
Cheţa M., Marcu, M.V., Borz, S.A. 2018. Workload, exposure to noise, and risk of musculoskeletal disorders: A case study of motor-manual tree felling and processing in poplar clear cuts. Forests 9, 300.
 
7.
Corella Justavino, F., Jimenez Ramirez, R., Meza Perez, N., Borz, S.A. 2015. The use of OWAS in forest operations postural assessment: advantages and limitations. Bull. Transilvania Univ. Braşov 8, 7–16.
 
8.
David, G.C. 2005. Ergonomic methods for assessing exposure to risk of factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Occup. Med-C. 55, 190–199.
 
9.
de Miguel-Díez, F., Reder, S., Wallor, E., Bahr, H., Blasko, L., Mund, J.-P., Cremer, T. 2022. Further application of using a personal laser scanner and simultaneous localization and mapping technology to estimate log’s volume and its comparison with traditional methods. International Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation 109, 102779.
 
10.
Forkuo, G.O., Borz S.A. 2023. Accuracy and inter-cloud precision of low-cost mobile LiDAR technology in estimating soil disturbance in forest operations. Front. For. Glob. Change 6,1224575.
 
11.
Gallis, C., 2006. Work-related prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms among Greek forest workers. Int. J. Ind. Ergonom. 36, 731–736.
 
12.
Grzywinski, W., Wandycz, A., Tomczak, A., Jelonek, T., 2016. The prevalence of self-reported musculoskeletal symptoms among loggers in Poland. Int. J. Ind. Ergonom. 52, 12–17.
 
13.
Helander, M., 2006. A Guide to Human Factors and Ergonomics, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA.
 
14.
Karhu, O., Kansi, P., Kuorinka, I. 1977. Correcting working postures in industry: a practical method for analysis. Appl. Ergon. 8, 199–201.
 
15.
Kemmerer, J., Labelle, E.R., 2021. Using harvester data from on-board computers: a review of key findings, opportunities and challenges. Eur. J. For. Res. 140 (1), 1–17.
 
16.
Leahu, I. 1994. Dendrometrie. Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică Bucureşti, 374 p.
 
17.
Lundbäck, M., Häggström, C., Nordfjell, T., 2021. Worldwide trends in methods for harvesting and extracting industrial roundwood. International Journal of Forest Engineering 32, 202–215.
 
18.
Marogel-Popa, T., Cheţa, M., Marcu, M.V., Duţă, C.I., Ioraş, F., Borz, S.A. 2019. Manual cultivation operations in poplar stands: A characterization of job difficulty and risks of health impairment. Int. J. Env. Res. Pub. Health 16, 1911.
 
19.
Marogel-Popa, T., Marcu, M.V., Borz, S.A. 2020. Postural risk in manual plating operations of poplar: two options compared. Sustainability 12, 5531.
 
20.
Moskalik, T., Borz, S.A., Dvorák, J., Ferencik, M., Glushkov, S., Muiste, P., Lazdinš, A., Styranivsky, O., 2017. Timber harvesting methods in Eastern European countries: A review. Croat. J. For. Eng. 38, 231–241.
 
21.
Müller, F., Jaeger, D., Hanewinkel, M., 2019. Digitization in wood supply-a review of how Industry 4.0 will change the forest value chain. Comput. Electron. Agr. 162, 206–218.
 
22.
Niţă, M.D., Borz S.A., 2023. Accuracy of a Smartphone-based freeware solution and two shape reconstruction algorithms in log volume measurements. Comput. Electron. Agr. 205, 107653.
 
23.
Spinelli, R., Aminti, G., Magagnotti, N., De Francesco, F. 2018. Postural risk assessment of small-scale debarkers for wooden post production. Forests 9, 111.
 
24.
Tomaštíc, J., Saloň, S., Tunák, D., Chudy, F., Kardoš, M. 2017. Tango in forests – an initial experience of the use of new Google technology in connection with forest inventory tasks. Comput. Electron. Agr. 141, 109–117.
 
25.
Zanuttini, R., Cielo, P., Poncino, D. 2005. The OWAS method. Preliminary results for the evaluation of the risk of work-related musculo-skeletal disorders (WMSD) in the forestry sector in Italy. For. Riv. Selvico. Ecol. For. 2, 242–255.
 
eISSN:2956-9141
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top